BLOGGER
![]() Youngest kid of six with an inferiority and black sheep complex, but determined that God saves not just his soul to heaven but the remainder of his manic-depressive life, so others won't say he became a Christian and remained a jerk.
MAIN THEMES
On identity i won't be transparent before i'm opaque. and you'll get to know me starting from the small things: who my favourite bands are. what kind of movies i like. who are my heroes. On Christianity I’m convinced that when confronted with sincere, real love, the Jesus factor will become obvious. But let’s not plant the cross before we carry it. I’m not trying to con you. On dreams Some dreams are meant to be achieved. I know that. But maybe other dreams are meant to drive us, privately. Never known to anyone but ourselves.
OTHER THEMES
On melancholy It is a sadness that, when choosing between crying and sighing, will choose sighing. I'd almost say that melancholy is being sad about sadness itself. On memory and nostalgia It saddens me when life moves forward and people decide that certain things are worth forgetting. On language I've learnt that the word irregardless is filed as a non-standard word in the English language. That's a lexicographer's way of saying it's not a real word. On politics Crowds are fickle things. So when we stand in the thousands and cry against the present government, do we know who we're actually crying for? On society People always want the best for themselves. But I want to sometimes take second or third or fourth best, just so that the loser down the road doesn't always have to come in last. It must feel like shit to always come in last. On growing old Leasehold property make me feel sad. It doesn't matter how old the family photos are that you put on your wall. It's your family but it's not really your wall. On philosophy I ask you, if God loves everyone, and if God is also incapable of loving evil, how can there be such a thing as an evil man? On a daily basis One line quips, like this. CHAT
VISITORS
FEEDS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
ARCHIVE
March 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 July 2005 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 February 2010 June 2010 |
Monday, February 09, 2009
(click here for a hillarious spoof of the jaws movie poster) we had a jewish pastor preach at church today. he preached what i always imagined was the quintessential jewish christian sermon, ie the jesus-is-so-very-the-OT-lamb-he's-not-kidding sermon. about half way through, when he told us that he'd done pesach with about a hundred plus singaporeans in traditional jewish style, i wondered, to what extent should we be judaeophilic? (right now, i'm also wondering two other things: firstly, if they had any checks in place for the lamb's blemish rating, and secondly, should 'judaeophile' be spelled 'judeophile', without the 'a'?) i know enough christians who are convinced that a truly authentic expression of their christian faith involves flag dancing, blowing weird-sounding horns during worship, knowing their hebrew root words and wearing tassled clothes. others either have their brains configured to judean geohistory or have one eye on the israel situation everyday. i've always been a bit iffy about this one. we're the gentile world right? i'm evangelising to and living among what is essentially globalised malaysians with our own ethnic hang-ups. what really is the relevance of an israel fixation in my world? but doesn't the bible say that i'm adopted into the bloodline of abraham, isaac and jacob? isn't that fundamentally the grandfamily of the jewish people? oh but wait. maybe i want to trim the fat off all the stereotypes of churchisms and seek an expression that's less culturally saturated and more kingdomlike. i don't know. idon'tknowifiwanttoknow. i wonder, what happens to us if it really does matter? i'm reading this book right now called the chosen, by jewish fiction writer chaim potok. i'm sure that's worth at least 50 judaeophile points. let's see. my favourite meat is pork. that's gotta be something like a minus 10,000. maybe if i pray hard enough, God will let me grow a beard. that must be worth at least 2000 points. nevermind the fact that i'd look way cool. Labels: christianity, identity |
8 Comments:
Eh even if God allows you to grow a beard, I wouldn't. HAHAHA!
By
Athalia, at 9:53 pm
what's the point deduction if i said jewish music/shofar/tassles/hebrew words don't do it for me in worship? my score's already minus 10k for loving porky. >.<
By
E, at 11:57 pm
don't like shofar? don't like tassles? no hebrew words? minus 500 points. wait. do you like tambourine dances? market rate for liking flag dance is 30 points. but tambourine dance is more rare. if you like that, in today's market, can easily get 70 to 80 points.
By
Genusfrog, at 2:07 pm
is 'hallelujah' hebrew? i try not to use that too - i prefer the english equivalent, but i do let it slip out sometimes :)
tambourine dances are rare - maybe cos they don't really go with the contemporary songs we sing, but i'm open to them.. my preferred frequency is once a year.
By
E, at 4:53 pm
hallelujah is actually very interesting, etymologically. "ha" is said to come from asia minor and while it is semantically obscure, it is speculated to mean something like a gesture of surprise.
the rest is simpler. "le" and "lu" come from the southern chinese dialects, and it means "you" or "your" while "jah" is found in most germanic languages as a sound denoting affirmation.
when put together, "halelujah" roughly means a surprised affirmation towards you and you. in other words, it's actually wrong to say halelujah to only one person because it implies that that person is actually two persons, which would make him/her godlike, and make it an idolatrous thing to say.
By
Genusfrog, at 5:14 pm
it then follows that the only way you can say "halelujah" to only one person is to drop one of the middle syllables, making it either "halejah" or "halujah", a feat mastered, undoubtedly, by all great rabbis.
By
Genusfrog, at 5:16 pm
LOL!!!!!
eh, i very gullible wan u know. u almost had me there!
good one, though.
By
E, at 5:21 pm
God is essentially three Persons (people, remembering your older post) so it makes sense to use Hallelujah for Him. Maybe you'd have to add another "lu".
By
oomoo, at 9:55 pm
Post a Comment
<< Home